July 25, 2004
Challenges and Solutions
Since this is the week for the Democrats' Convention, the press will be essentially cheerleading and giving the Democrats an opportunity to showcase their views. I don't have a problem with it as long as they do the same for the RNC convention. The American people deserve an opportunity to hear what the political parties have to say.
I'll probably watch portions of the convention. At least, I'll watch as much of it as I can stand. What I want to see is how the Democrats propose we deal with the major issues facing our country:
- The Global War on Terror - Many other nations lack the moral and political courage to even admit there's a GWOT, much less fight it. Still others seem to be content with half-measures accompanied by wishful thinking that somehow they won't be as affected. The Wahhabis and their spiritual comrades are bent on the destruction of democracy. How do the Democrats propose we deal with this problem? So far, I've heard them speak of "internationalizing" the effort and getting other nations involved, but I'd like to see how exactly they mean to do that. Can they do it without sacrificing the sovreignty of the US or without placing us at undue risk? From what I can see, John Kerry would like to "engage" other countries by appeasing them or at the very least place their interests above ours in certain key areas to buy their cooperation.
- Judicial Activism - It seems like we hear of strange decisions by the Ninth Circuit Court on a regular basis. Then there's the court who in Massachusetts decreed that legislators must allow for gay marriages. The Court is not supposed to make the laws, only to uphold them yet a great many judges seem to feel it is legitimate to rule by judicial decree. I don't see any concern on the part of Democrats about this issue or any desire to do anything about it.
- The Power of the Government vs the Freedom of the Individual - It seems there's an ever-present desire on the part of the federal government to regulate our lives. This extends even to the role of the federal government in relation to the states. Unfunded mandates are an increasing burden on the part of the states. How do the Democrats intend to rein in the power of the federal government? Do they even want to do so?
- Entitlement vs Personal Responsibility - As a nation we need to come to some consensus regarding the "rights" of our citizens. Do we have a "right" to basic health care? Is government primarily responsible for teaching our children right and wrong? How will the Democrats address the basic needs of our citizens? Will they address them in a way that empowers people or creates greater dependency?
- Public Integrity - Those in power must have integrity. Can the Democrats assure us that they will not abuse the public trust?
In the midst of these and other concerns, the Democrats are beginning their convention by having Jimmy Carter and Al Gore speak. Not exactly an auspicious way to start.
Posted by jdmays at July 25, 2004 05:04 PM
| TrackBack
Due to the proliferation of comment spam, I've had to close comments on this
entry. If you would like to leave comment, please use one of my recent
entries. Thank you and sorry for any inconvience caused.
Sadly, you and I both know that the coverage of the DNC will be far different than that of the RNC. The mainstream media is no more interested in showing the American people what the choices are than the Dems themselves. I long for a good debate on the issues, but you won't see it this election. It's all about soundbites, attacks, and misinformation.
I agree with Norman on one point above: "I long for a good debate on the issues ..." I, too, crave for a good old-fashioned debate between President Bush and Sen. Kerry.
In March of this year, Kerry put forth the offer to debate Bush on the issues (especially criticisms presented in the GOP ads). We'd get our debate except ... Bush continues to reject the offer as far as I know.